In today’s information society, the issue of copyright infringement often rears its ugly head, and, in New Zealand, the phrase on everyone’s lips is "section 92A"." > In today’s information society, the issue of copyright infringement often rears its ugly head, and, in New Zealand, the phrase on everyone’s lips is "section 92A"." /> In today’s information society, the issue of copyright infringement often rears its ugly head, and, in New Zealand, the phrase on everyone’s lips is "section 92A"." >
Story image

ISPs’ dilemma: the curse of section 92A

01 Apr 09

In today’s information society, the issue of copyright infringement often rears its ugly head, and, in New Zealand, the phrase on everyone’s lips is “section 92A”.

There has been a lot of publicity around section 92A and significant developments in recent months, so whether you’re concerned or just curious, here’s a summary of what it’s about.
What is section 92A?
Section 92A is a provision of the Copyright Act 1994, due to come into force on 27 March 2009, which will require internet service providers to have policy for terminating accounts of repeat infringers of copyright. You can view it at There are many subjects of controversy surrounding section 92A, but we will focus on our top three:

  • Balance of rights: Copyright infringement has traditionally been an issue between a copyrights holder and the infringer. Section 92A states: “An Internet service provider must adopt and reasonably implement a policy that provides for termination, in appropriate circumstances, of the account with that Internet service provider of a repeat infringer.” It places the ISP between these parties – requiring the ISP to be judge, jury and executioner – with the ISP being potentially liable to its customers and to rights holders in relation to decisions that it makes.

  • Vagueness: What do the words “reasonably implement” mean? What are “appropriate circumstances”? The legislation leaves us with little guidance. Where an ISP and a disgruntled rights holder do not see eye-to-eye on the matter, will the courts be required to determine what these words mean? We certainly hope not.

  • Definition of ISP: The amendment says: “Internet service provider means a person who does either or both of the following things: (a) offers the transmission, routing, or providing of connections for digital online communications, between or among points specified by a user, of material of the user’s choosing; (b) hosts material on websites or other electronic retrieval systems that can be accessed by a user.” This definition of an ISP is incredibly wide, encompassing practically anyone who provides a shared internet connection or website. This may include businesses, schools, libraries, or government departments. The definition of ISP has an impact on the scope of, and compliance costs relating to, section 92A.

Who will come to save the day?
The Telecommunications Carriers Forum (TCF) has established a working party to develop a self-regulated code of practice for managing issues raised by section 92A, for adoption by TCF members and ISPs in New Zealand.
The Draft TCF Internet Service Provider Copyright Code of Practice was released for public consultation on 4 February 2009. Submissions were due by 6 March 2009. However, even if the TCF code is finally agreed, this may not be the end of the matter. It is but one example of the type of “policy for terminating accounts of repeat infringers” described under section 92A; it does not amend or supplant the legislation.
Recent developments
On 23 February, five days before section 92A was originally due to come into force, Prime Minister John Key announced that it would be deferred for one month.
It is intended that this time be used by the industry and the TCF to agree a workable code of practice in relation to the section. The Prime Minister indicated that, if no agreement is reached, then section 92A would be suspended. However, if a code of practice is agreed, there would be a review after six months to see if the law is working as it was intended.
On 11 March, TelstraClear (a TCF member) announced its withdrawal of support for the TCF industry-wide code. Without unanimous support from its members, the TCF cannot formally ratify a code of practice, which throws the likelihood of reaching an “agreement” into even further doubt.
Businesses beware
By the time you are reading this article, unless it is further suspended or indeed repealed, section 92A will have come into force. It will affect all “internet service providers” (as defined) which, if you are a business, is likely to include you. To ensure that you don’t get caught out, we recommend that you consult with your lawyers now!
Corin Maberly is a partner, and Ken Ginn is a senior solicitor, at MGF Webb, a firm specialising in technology and communications law.
+64 9 970 4100

Proofpoint launches feature to identify most targeted users
“One of the largest security industry misconceptions is that most cyberattacks target top executives and management.”
How blockchain will impact NZ’s economy
Distributed ledgers and blockchain are anticipated to provide a positive uplift to New Zealand’s economy.
McAfee named Leader in Magic Quadrant an eighth time
The company has been once again named as a Leader in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for Security Information and Event Management.
Symantec and Fortinet partner for integration
The partnership will deliver essential security controls across endpoint, network, and cloud environments.
Review: Blue Mic’s Satellite headphones are good but...
Blue Mic’s newest wireless headphones deliver on sound, aesthetic, and comfort - but there is a more insidious issue at hand.
Is Supermicro innocent? 3rd party test finds no malicious hardware
One of the larger scandals within IT circles took place this year with Bloomberg firing shots at Supermicro - now Supermicro is firing back.
Forcepoint and Chillisoft - “a powerful combination”
Following Chillisoft’s portfolio expansion by signing on Forcepoint, the companies’ execs explain how this is a match made in cybersecurity heaven.
David Hickling in memoriam: “Celebrate the life and the music it made”
Dave was a well-respected presence in the IT channel and his recent death was felt by all the many people who knew him as a colleague and a friend.